ABC bashes skeptics

“Science under siege”. That is how the ABC described the anti-carbon tax rallies on their so-called science program, Catalyst last night.

Appearing on this episode was Ian Chubb, who described the anti-carbon tax movement as a broadside on science, not just climate science but science generally. He compared protesters to those who persecuted Galileo, claiming we are still in the middle ages.

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the guy who keeps failing to predict the demise of the great barrier reef, almost came to tears about the death threats he has faced. It really was quite theatrical. If these threats are legitimate, then it is atrocious behaviour, yet the attempt to use them to smear the reasonable skeptics is unjustifiable.

They complain about the politicisation of the debate, and yet a program supposedly devoted to science, has been dominated by politics.

They tried to paint the anti-carbon tax protesters as extremists, and had a go at Lord Monckon with the same brush, only thing was, they misrepresented him. They claimed that Monckton has said people should vote on whether carbon dioxide was a threat (this from the “consensus” crowd), but he was actually saying the Australian people should get the chance to vote on the carbon tax (it’s called democracy). The ABC also claim he was inciting violence, a “call to arms”. In reality he was calling for the prosecution of the scientists at the centre of climategate, not trying to start his own militia.

In their attack on anti-carbon tax protesters, the ABC denigrates ordinary Australians, the people who fund their stinkin’ organisation. They even mock a protester who had the gall to suggest carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Yet, not all anti-carbon tax protesters are skeptics, they just don’t want a carbon tax because it will do nothing to the climate regardless. It doesn’t matter to the ABC, they’re all part of the anti-science campaign.

Their argument that skeptics are opposed to science is based on the idea that the science is settled, and when you accept that it’s not, their argument really falls apart. Are the scientists opposed to the mainstream also attacking science?

Ever since I was six, I have been interested in the natural world, and soon I developed an interest in science. I take exception to these accusations of anti-science, and I’m sure so do many other ordinary Australians, who have been attacked mercilessly by the network who is suppose to serve the Australian people.


About Climate Nonconformist

Hi, I'm the climatenonconformist (not my real name), and I am a global warming skeptic, among the few in generation Y. With Australia facing the prospect of a carbon tax, we need to be asking the simple question; where is the evidence that our emissions are causing any dangerous warming?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to ABC bashes skeptics

  1. Richard A says:

    “Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the guy who keeps failing to predict the demise of the great barrier reef, almost came to tears about the death threats he has faced. ” Yes I almost came to tears of laughter when I heard the temperature rise was going to destroy the reef, given the water temperature over the length of the reef would vary by more than the predicted temperature rise…..

  2. Pingback: Climate Fool of the Week #10 | Climate Nonconformist

  3. Pingback: Skeptics and Science | Climate Nonconformist

  4. Pingback: Slanting the debate | Climate Nonconformist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s