Fairfax balanced, but then smears with innuendo

The Age has published a response to the top-rated warmist question in their ‘Our Say’ segment. The question basically asked where skeptics are getting their funding from. For the most part, it is a balanced response, acknowledging that Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones haven’t formed their view on global warming based on money. However, the graphic accompanying the article is likely to portray the opposite meaning and they go on to suggest links to Gina Rinehart and other corporate interests with pointless innuendo.

They imply that Gina Rinehart’s skepticism is solely because of her corporate interests (it’s not like she could have looked critically at some of these warmist claims), make a point over Alan Jones being friends with James Packer and suggest Rinehart’s buying into of Channel 10 resulted in Bolt getting his own show. They’ve got no hard evidence, but their implication is clear. However, the author does acknowledge these links are casual, not causal.

The question asked of The Age smacks of a conspiracy theory. Even though the response was dismissive of such intimate connections, it is more likely to fuel the fire.


About Climate Nonconformist

Hi, I'm the climatenonconformist (not my real name), and I am a global warming skeptic, among the few in generation Y. With Australia facing the prospect of a carbon tax, we need to be asking the simple question; where is the evidence that our emissions are causing any dangerous warming?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s