Heaven help us if he ever becomes Liberal leader again

Out-0f-place Liberal frontbencher Malcolm Turnbull has launched yet another attack on skeptics (see here for previous attack).

OPPOSITION frontbencher Malcolm Turnbull has compared climate change sceptics with people who refuse to admit smoking causes lung cancer.

The study of the world’s surface temperatures by Richard Muller was partially bankrolled by a foundation connected to global warming deniers.

Mr Turnbull said the backers of the study “presumably” hoped to demonstrate climate science was not reliable, and used the results to criticise people who continually question global warming.

“They’re like the guy who gets told by his doctor to stop smoking, lose weight and decides not to do that,” he said.

Turnbull’s continuous use of that tobacco line is not only getting a bit old, it is just plain insulting. It is nothing but a baseless smear by a man who I doubt has even heard a skeptic make his case. Perhaps he should have a chat to some of his colleagues in the Liberal party, like Dr Dennis Jensen.

Turnbull’s ignorance at the position of most skeptics is evident by his claim that BEST completely refuted them. As Bolt notes, “if he doesn’t even know the questions, how can he be so sure he has the answers?” For those like Malcolm, here are some arguments made by skeptics.

Abbott only got up by one vote in that leadership challenge two years ago. It’s scary to think how close he came to failing, which would have left us stuck with Turnbull as leader and an ETS already.

References:

  • Caillon N, Severinghaus J, Jouzel J, Barnola J, Kang J, Lipenvok V, 2003, Timing of atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic temperature changes across termination III, Science, vol 299, iss 5613, pp 1728-1731.
  • Douglass D, Christy J, Pearson B, Singer F, 2007, A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model predictions, International Journal of Climatology, vol 28, iss 13, pp 1693-1701.
  • Lindzen R, Choi Y, 2011, On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications, Asian Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, vol 47, iss 4, pp 377-390.
  • Loehle C, 2007, A 2000-year global temperature reconstruction based on non-tree ring proxies, Energy and Environment, vol 18, iss 7-8, pp 1049-1058.
  • McIntyre S, McKitrick R, 2005, The M&M critique of the MBH98 northern hemisphere climate index: update and implications, Energy and Environment, vol 16, iss 1, pp 69-100.
  • Spencer R, Braswell W, 2010, On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol 115, iss D16, pp 1-13.
Advertisements

About Climate Nonconformist

Hi, I'm the climatenonconformist (not my real name), and I am a global warming skeptic, among the few in generation Y. With Australia facing the prospect of a carbon tax, we need to be asking the simple question; where is the evidence that our emissions are causing any dangerous warming?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Heaven help us if he ever becomes Liberal leader again

  1. PeterD says:

    Dr Jenson is a scientist. As AGW is politics, no-one listens to him.
    Mr Turbull is a merchant banker. I suspect there is a significant conflict of interest here, and all other merchant bankers & carbon traders will closely support him.
    This is not about the science. It’s money.

  2. Pingback: Tax the Hospitals | Climate Nonconformist

  3. Pingback: Abbott: I’ll kill tax within six months of being elected | Climate Nonconformist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s