Graham Readfern’s getting a bit jittery about skeptics getting their point of view across. His article in The Age bears a picture of a rather sinister-looking Lord Monckton.
As I watched the video last Tuesday evening, news was just emerging that mining billionaire and Asia’s richest woman, Gina Rinehart, had bought $192 million worth of shares in Fairfax (the publisher of Brisbane Times, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and many regional newspapers and city-based radio stations) to take her share in the company to about 12.6 per cent.
To me, these two events were intrinsically linked, and not just because Mr Manners is a personal friend of Ms Rinehart’s.
And skeptics are the conspiracy theorists?
Once again, so? Do warmists not discuss ideas? Do some of these warmists not also have lots of money (though not quite as much)?
Monckton supporter and News Limited columnist Andrew Bolt, (an “expert” along with Lord Monckton on the activist climate sceptic group the Galileo Movement) blew his dog whistle, sending a handful of his regular lap dog commentators over to my blog to post insults, which I duly deleted.
Is he suggesting that Bolt instructed his readers to write vitriolic comments? If he’s trying to smear skeptics by highlighting some of the idiots, then perhaps he should look at the stuff warmists come up with. There are nuts on both sides, Graham.
Campaign group Get Up! was more than a little spooked at the video. They republished it, adding some subtitles, and posted it on their YouTube channel.
Spooked is right. What is wrong with someone establishing a new channel putting forth a different view? Afterall, we need something to counteract the bias of the ABC (which we still have to pay for).
In his response, Lord Monckton claimed he had previously revealed a United Nations plot to install a world government (he didn’t) and that he had “parachuted” in to a UN climate conference (he didn’t do that either, according to a contact who was there and tells me he dropped in to a beach three kilometres away).
While Readfern has his fingers in his ears, the UN continues to discuss proposals that resemble such an entity (here, here and here). Also, when I see Readfern perform a similar stunt to express his views, then I’ll pay this dismissal of Monckton’s effort some respect.
Once Lord Monckton returns from the gates of hell to retrieve his Nobe (sic) Peace Prize, perhaps Ms Rinehart, Ron Manners and the rest of Monckton’s supporters could then go off in search of some credibility, which is irredeemably tarnished by their association with him.
Only in the eyes of alarmists such as yourself, Graham. And this is the position the global warming movement is now in. When the science is letting you down, resort to smear tactics.
Why is it Warmers feel compelled to delete? Whenever they find something they do not like or could be damning they delete it…whether it is comments, emails, data….LOL
I was struck with how proud he is of deleting comments. ” Duly Deleted”. Well how powerful you must feel. My thinking is that there were no such posts and he is conjuring up a straw man. It’s like the entire warming game. A real man would allow the comments so he could prove his point with their words. If they are ” deleted ” we have no way of knowing if they were truly filled with vitrol…or if they were posted at all……………
Although this blog was created recently and was an attempt by a Warmer to smear Anthony Watts. The point he made in his first entry was he would allow comments and would not delete like Watts does …notice the projection. Well I posted ( in the comments) how he was wrong on the timeline in the blog vs SNL skit and now he does not allow comments….and has not posted anything new on his blog since.
What to make of this? Take a look.
http://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/
Dude beat me to it! “which I duly deleted.” No opposing thoughts allowed in Alarmist areas.